Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Juvenile Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County juvenile-justice director warns state rule limits juvenile arrest warrants, complicating supervision
Summary
Walla Walla County juvenile justice officials said state court rule changes now prevent issuing juvenile arrest warrants unless a court finds the youth poses a substantial threat to public safety, hampering supervision of probation violators.
Walla Walla County—s juvenile justice director told the county commissioners that recent appellate litigation and the state Supreme Court—s handling of Juvenile Court Rule 716 have significantly curtailed the ability of juvenile courts to issue arrest warrants, absent a finding that the young person poses a serious threat to community safety.
Nori, the county—s juvenile justice director, said the rule was first changed during COVID to quash juvenile warrants. An appellate panel later found the state Supreme Court overstepped; the Supreme Court reversed the appellate ruling and the quash order remains in effect. "Essentially where that left juvenile courts was in a situation where a youth under the court's jurisdiction may have a probation violation, but the court could not issue a warrant unless it could be shown the juvenile posed a serious threat to public safety," Nori told the board.
He said the new standard is a high bar that makes participation in juvenile court effectively voluntary for some youth who avoid hearings and supervision without an arrest warrant. Nori and board members discussed the department—s approach — arguing risk to self as an indicator of community risk, using engagement and services rather than detention, and relying on the deputy prosecutor to seek individual findings when necessary.
Nori also updated commissioners on related juvenile and adult programs: the department is implementing a Public Safety Assessment tool for adults, is pursuing several HCA Medicaid transformation steps (including cohort onboarding for billing), and is applying for grant funding to sustain pretrial positions.
What the board will do next: Commissioners asked staff for more documentation on the appellate decisions and said they may invite "heavy hitters" (external stakeholders) to discuss the policy implications and next steps. The juvenile director offered to circulate the appellate and Supreme Court filings to the clerk for the board—s review.
