Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Film Permit Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cupertino approves first reading of film‑permit ordinance, narrows exemptions and tightens residential hours
Summary
Council conducted first reading of a film‑production ordinance to require commercial film permits, adopt insurance and noticing rules, set residential filming to end by 8 p.m. and require 72‑hour notice; the council removed a 501(c)(4) fee exemption.
The Cupertino City Council on Tuesday conducted the first reading of a draft film‑production ordinance that would require permits for most commercial filming within city limits, establish insurance and neighborhood‑notice requirements, and allow the city to recover staff costs.
Samantha Lucurto, communications and marketing coordinator, told the council the ordinance (draft referenced as Ordinance 252279 in the staff report) is aimed at creating a clear process for inquiries that are currently handled on an ad hoc basis. The draft would require permits for commercial filming on public and private property while exempting news media, non‑commercial home videos and studio filming; student and 501(c)(3) nonprofit productions would be required to apply but be granted a fee exemption under the draft.
“Currently, without an ordinance, there is no clear procedure for how filming requests are handled,” Lucurto said. “The creation of an ordinance would create a clear process and guidelines for those seeking to film within the city and would also help recover costs associated with staff time.”
Public commenters urged care to avoid overreach — asking for clarity about whether noncommercial home videos, school projects, wedding photos, or small TikTok creators would be required to apply — and raised concerns about notification distances and short notice windows. The city attorney and staff clarified the draft is intended to focus on commercial production; noncommercial home videos and private filming would not be subject to the permit process.
Councilmembers proposed narrow changes to the draft during deliberations. They agreed to require 72‑hour notice to nearby residents (staff can later define the precise notification method by administrative action), to limit residential filming hours to end by 8 p.m., and to remove a fee exemption for 501(c)(4) entities so fee policy would treat such groups the same as other commercial or political entities when the production is commercial in nature.
Councilmember Freund offered a substitute motion removing the 501(c)(4) fee exemption; that substitute carried unanimously. The council also voted unanimously to adopt the ordinance’s first reading with the direction to prepare a fee schedule and minor administrative details (notice method, signage and specific hour limits) to return at second reading.
What’s next: staff will forward the draft to the California Film Commission for its review, prepare a fee schedule for council consideration at second reading (expected in December) and publish application information and guidance on the city website if the ordinance is adopted.
