Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge changes after election-day conflicts at church polling place
Summary
Several residents told the Fluvanna Board of Supervisors they witnessed hostile interactions and targeted criticism at a church polling place on Nov. 4, 2025, and urged the county to consider alternative public locations and clearer rules for campaign activity near polling sites.
Get email alerts on the Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents pressing the Fluvanna County Board of Supervisors on Nov. 5 described election-day incidents at a church used as a polling place and urged the board to explore alternatives and clearer guidelines for campaign activity.
"If people cannot be treated with respect regardless of what your beliefs are...we need to start looking at other places to hold elections," Tracy Smith said during public comment, referring to confrontations she observed at one precinct. Multiple speakers said the main concerns were behavior by individuals at campaign tents located near the 40-foot line around polling locations, not the churches themselves.
Don Rainer asked the board for consistent, county-wide guidelines for candidate activity at public events and pointed to uneven enforcement at recent community events. James Kelly said relying on places of worship as polling sites forces voters who do not share the venue's faith to enter religious spaces and can chill free speech; he recommended prioritizing public buildings such as schools.
Tim Hodge, a resident and elections volunteer, clarified state precinct rules: voters must cast ballots in their precinct and, when a precinct lacks a public building, an available facility in the precinct is used (often a church). He urged directing criticism at individuals whose conduct is offensive rather than the facility hosting voting.
Several speakers asked the board to support the registrar with resources for expanded satellite or public voting sites and to press the state for more funding for election administration. The board did not take action at the meeting on changing polling locations; board members acknowledged limited facility options and discussed forwarding concerns to constitutional officers and state legislators.

