Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Updates topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lewiston planning board votes to initiate citywide zoning updates to comply with recent state laws
Summary
The Lewiston Planning Board voted unanimously to initiate amendments to Appendix A of the zoning and land-use code to align local rules with several recent state legislative changes and make other housekeeping updates. Staff will return with red-line text, maps and public hearing materials before a final vote.
The Lewiston Planning Board voted unanimously to initiate amendments to Appendix A of the city’s zoning and land-use code, moving a package of staff-recommended changes into the drafting and public-hearing phase.
The motion, offered during the board’s regular meeting, directed staff to prepare red-line language and maps showing how the proposed edits will bring Lewiston into compliance with recent state laws and to return for public hearings this winter. Chair Shanna Cox called the roll after the motion and all voting members recorded affirmative votes.
Why it matters: The changes are intended to ensure local regulations mirror amended state requirements and to tidy multiple sections of the code that staff identified as inconsistent or outdated. Staff told the board the package targets 10 areas: accessory dwelling units (ADUs), setback variances tied to recent LD changes, parking standards in designated growth areas, day-care uses, mobile-home standards, multiple single- and two-family structures, walls and fences, downtown residential lot size, minimum height requirements in Neighborhood Conservation B, and minor land-use chart updates.
Staff presentations and board questions focused on which elements are mandatory under state law and which are discretionary. Shelley, the staff memo author, told the board several items are "cut and dry" legislative compliance changes; others will require mapping and red-lines so members can see where zoning districts intersect with the growth-area overlay adopted under LD 2003.
Board members asked for more targeted materials before final drafting. On parking standards, staff said they will prepare maps showing which zoning districts fall in the growth overlay and proposed numerical changes; for ADUs and day-care uses staff will return with red-line language and an explanation of how the state amendments limit local discretion. On walls and fences, members asked staff to clarify appeals or recourse if code enforcement exercises new setback discretion.
Next steps: Staff expects to return with a finalized red-line package and public-hearing notice before the end of the year, possibly at the board’s November meeting or in December. The board’s initiation vote does not adopt code language — it authorizes staff to prepare formal amendments and schedule public hearings.
