Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Dual Enrollment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves renewed dual-enrollment agreement with University of Arizona after debate over PPEL 101
Summary
Trustees approved a renewed IGA with the University of Arizona to expand dual-enrollment course options (engineering, biotech and a proposed PPEL 101 course). An amendment to remove PPEL 101 failed 2—; the original IGA passed 3'. Board asked administration to clarify course catalog vetting and tuition/cost support.
The Chandler Unified School District governing board voted 3' on Oct. 8 to approve a renewed intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with the University of Arizona to extend dual-enrollment opportunities through the 2029-30 academic year.
Administration said the updated IGA consolidates previously separate agreements so multiple university courses (engineering, MCB 101/102 biotechnology, and a new proposed PPEL 101 course titled "Markets & Morality") would be available for eligible CUSD students to earn University of Arizona credit should a local campus choose to implement the offerings.
Trustee Kurt Rohrs moved to amend the IGA to remove PPEL 101 from the agreement, expressing concern that the course's description (covering markets, morality and political economy) strays into political and moral instruction that belongs to families and non-school institutions. "I believe that this course should not be offered in the high school," Rohrs said. His amendment was seconded and defeated 2—.
District instructional staff explained that dual-enrollment offerings require alignment to district course catalogs and standards; any course the district chooses to offer would undergo the course-catalog approval process and come to the board before it is taught locally. Staff noted PPEL 101 had been vetted by social-studies instructional leads for alignment to economics standards and was included to expand upper-level economics/entrepreneurship options where community college partners have not offered comparable dual-credit options.
Board discussion also sought clarity on whether the University would reduce tuition for dual-enrollment credits and what supports exist for families who cannot afford tuition. Administration said staff would follow up on per-credit costs and financial assistance options (including foundation support) and that, in general, the district works with families and donors to remove access barriers.
After the failed amendment the board approved the IGA renewal, 3'. The board directed administration to return with the course-catalog review and with tuition/assistance details before any U of A course is implemented locally.
