Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

SBCTA outlines Measure I benefits and local returns to Chino Hills

Chino Hills City Council · August 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Tim Watkins of the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority presented Measure I funding history and uses, said Measure I generates about $250 million annually and that Chino Hills receives roughly $2 million a year for local transportation projects.

Chino Hills — Tim Watkins, chief of legislative and public affairs at the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA), presented an overview of Measure I at the Aug. 12 Chino Hills City Council meeting, describing the half-cent sales tax’s history, governance and local impacts.

Watkins said Measure I — first approved in 1989 and extended by voters in 2004 — is a locally controlled half-cent sales tax dedicated to transportation improvements across San Bernardino County. He told the council Measure I currently generates about $250 million annually and that approximately one-third of that goes back to local jurisdictions; “I think Chino Hills gets roughly $2,000,000 a year back to Chino Hills for transportation or for local streets and road projects,” he said.

Watkins described range of Measure I investments, including freeway extensions and interchange upgrades, Metrolink expansion, bus-route improvements and active-transportation projects such as bike lanes and pedestrian safety work. He emphasized oversight measures, noting an independent taxpayer oversight committee and that administrative costs are “only about 1%” of the measure.

During Q&A, council members asked whether Peyton Avenue’s extension south of Woodview Road to Soko Canyon Parkway is conditioned on local development; city staff said there is no timeline and that construction would be driven by development, with Measure I funds potentially contributing. A council member also asked whether a more substantial sales tax increase (to 1¢) is under consideration; Watkins said the SBCTA board and staff are evaluating options and no board action has been taken.

Watkins encouraged public engagement, noting a Measure I report and survey are available on SBCTA’s website for input on future priorities.