Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Appeals Court hears dispute over whether VFW sale closing was extended to Oct. 29, 2020

November 05, 2025 | Judicial - Appeals Court Oral Arguments, Judicial, Massachusetts


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Appeals Court hears dispute over whether VFW sale closing was extended to Oct. 29, 2020
The panel considered whether the purchase-and-sale agreement for a VFW post property in Revere was effectively extended to Oct. 29, 2020, and whether the church plaintiff had shown it was ready, willing and able to close.

Tom Campbell, representing the Mottolo post (VFW), argued the church could not have closed without Eastern Bank financing and a certificate of occupancy and that the post’s new management terminated the transaction well before the contested closing date. Campbell emphasized that, in his view, the unsigned extension language and a management change showed the parties were not in mutual, enforceable agreement to extend.

Peter Calabresi for Christian Church Logos of God countered that the record included multiple signed or otherwise effective extensions, email exchanges that the trial court credited as an extension, evidence of zoning work and attorney invoicing related to the sale, and bank documents and account statements showing funds sufficient to close. Calabresi argued specific performance was appropriate given the seller's conduct and admitted documentary evidence—including a draft lease/leaseback email chain and conditional municipal approvals—demonstrated the parties’ ongoing efforts.

The panel questioned whether a bank commitment required a certificate of occupancy to close, whether summary judgment or a jury trial should decide disputed fact questions, and whether the premature termination meant the plaintiff failed to meet its burden at summary judgment. The matter was taken as submitted.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Massachusetts articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI