Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Porterville council orders review of procedural handbook after dispute over city seal and use of resources
Summary
Council directed staff and the city attorney to clarify procedural handbook language on the use of city funds, facilities and the city seal after debate over whether councilmember events and signage improperly used city resources; council also approved changes to meeting order by 4-1.
Get email alerts on the Council Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A contentious debate over when council members may use city resources and the city seal ended with the Porterville City Council asking staff and the city attorney to return with clarified policy language and options for restricting political or personal use of the city seal.
Vice Mayor McCurvey said staff should "follow the rules" and called use of the seal for personal or campaign-like events inappropriate. “I think it’s an abuse of the city seal,” he said during discussion of proposed procedural handbook amendments. Several other council members echoed concerns about appearance and public trust.
Councilmember Ray Beltran defended his recent Q&A event in public spaces and said minor expenditures (a gazebo rental and a printed sign under his discretionary allowance) were part of official constituent engagement. “I’m conducting my official business as a city representative,” he said, adding that the handbook text is ambiguous about pre‑approved discretionary spending.
City Attorney counsel explained that state law limits prosecution for political use of the seal to large-scale or intentionally misleading mass mailings (generally defined as 200 or more pieces), but she said cities commonly adopt local restrictions to clarify and enforce rules. Staff will return with draft edits to the handbook that could include clearer prior-approval rules for use of city facilities, staff support and the city seal — and, if council desires, ordinance language to limit third-party misuse.
Council also debated the meeting agenda order. Vice Mayor McCurvey proposed moving committee and staff reports ahead of oral communications to focus the meeting on city business and reduce disruptive openings; the council approved a motion to reorder meeting elements (passes 4–1) and directed staff to draft handbook edits to reflect the change.
What’s next: staff and the city attorney will review the handbook’s language on discretionary spending, letterhead and the city seal, explore whether an ordinance is needed to regulate third‑party use of the seal, and bring proposed amendments back to the council for consideration.

