Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Noise Ordinance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

2 Rivers council defeats staff proposal to give city manager short-term noise-waiver authority

City Council of 2 Rivers · November 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After extended debate about public notice, decibel limits and business flexibility, the council voted down a motion that would have blocked staff's proposed change; the staff proposal to allow administrative three-day noise waivers was not adopted.

The 2 Rivers City Council in a lengthy Nov. 3 discussion declined to adopt a staff proposal that would have delegated authority to grant short-term noise waivers to city staff.

Staff introduced an amendment to municipal code Chapter 9-2 to allow the city manager to approve temporary waivers up to three days for events that would otherwise require a council decision. City staff said the change was intended to spare small businesses from calling special meetings for short-notice requests; the example cited was a last-minute live-music request that previously prompted a special meeting.

Several councilmembers and the police chief raised concerns that the proposal could limit public notice and reduce residents' ability to weigh in. Councilmembers asked for specific decibel or time limits for any administrative approvals and noted potential enforcement burdens on police. "If it's submitted and there's no council meeting between the submission and the date of the event, you could give staff approval for a limited amount of extra time or decibels," a staff presenter said while offering possible middle-ground amendments.

On a roll-call motion "to not amend chapters 9-2 as stated on the agenda" (effectively denying the staff draft), the council recorded 2 ayes and 7 noes and the motion failed; the practical result was that the staff proposal was not adopted in the form presented and council asked staff to return with revised language and options that could include clear numerical limits and public-notice protections.

Councilmembers directed staff to draft alternate language that would preserve public notice and provide discrete administrative standards (for example, maximum decibel allowances or a requirement that staff seek a special meeting when possible). The discussion will continue in future work sessions or as a revised ordinance brought back for council consideration.