Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Burning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
East Greenwich pauses second reading of open‑burning ordinance after hours of public testimony
Summary
After a lengthy public hearing on Aug. 12, the East Greenwich Town Council continued the second reading of a revision to Chapter 47 (Open Burning) so staff can add definitions and limit discretionary enforcement; the council set a continuation for Oct. 14, 2025.
The East Greenwich Town Council on Tuesday continued the second reading of an ordinance that would clarify and restrict open burning and the use of recreational open‑flame devices, directing staff to return with clearer definitions and less discretionary enforcement.
Council President Mark Schwager opened the hearing on an amended Chapter 47 after staff noted the draft had not changed since the July 14 meeting. The proposed ordinance would add a new Section 47‑5 on use of open‑flame devices and refine exceptions in Section 47‑2.
Residents and the fire department pressed the council for a clearer distinction between "open burning" (brush and landscape burns, often permitted by a chief's permit) and "recreational" fires (fire pits, chimneys and grills). Christopher Cousineau, who lives in the historic Hill and Harbor district, told the council: "I urge the town council to ban all recreational fires in East Greenwich." He said, if a ban is not adopted, the town should prioritize "health, personal property and safety requirements above recreational activities." (Christopher Cousineau, public comment.)
Fire Department representatives explained enforcement and permitting practices. The fire marshal described the department’s approach: "If somebody is burning construction debris or plywood, we would extinguish that fire," and noted limits on permits during red‑flag warnings and seasonal restrictions.
Councilors pressed for bright‑line language so police and fire personnel would have clear standards to enforce rather than rely on ad‑hoc judgments. Several residents urged zoning‑based exemptions for large lots and tighter limits in dense neighborhoods, citing smoke and health impacts.
After discussion, the council voted to continue the second reading and public hearing to Tuesday, Oct. 14, 2025, and asked staff and legal counsel to develop a definition section separating "open burning" from "recreational" uses, clarify fuel and setback limits, and propose hours and permit procedures. The motion to continue carried 5–0.
The council and staff said further work sessions will include police and fire input before the ordinance returns for a formal vote.
The council took no final action on the ordinance Tuesday; the public hearing will resume on Oct. 14, 2025.
