Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

California Board of Pharmacy votes to set public hearing on pharmacist-in-charge rule

November 12, 2025 | California State Board of Pharmacy, Other State Agencies, Executive, California



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

California Board of Pharmacy votes to set public hearing on pharmacist-in-charge rule
The California State Board of Pharmacy on Nov. 5 authorized its executive officer to set a public hearing on a petition asking the board to amend the regulation that governs the designation and employment of a pharmacist-in-charge.

Board President Sung Oh told members the petition, received Oct. 7, asked the agency to adopt or amend the first sentence of the pharmacist-in-charge provision and that, under Government Code section 11340.6, the agency must respond within 30 days by either denying the petition or scheduling a hearing. Regulation counsel Jennifer Robbins was available to answer members’ questions during the discussion.

Member Satinder Sandu moved to authorize the executive officer to set the matter for hearing; Ricardo Sanchez seconded the motion. On roll-call, all voting members present recorded “yes” and the motion passed. The board and staff told members the hearing would be conducted in advance of the board’s January meeting; staff indicated January 26–27, 2026 as the proposed hearing dates to solicit public comment and any proposed regulatory language for the board’s later consideration.

The board’s action is procedural: it schedules a hearing to receive public input and draft language but does not itself change the regulation. Jennifer Robbins and staff said comments received at the hearing will be provided to the board for consideration at a future meeting.

Next steps: staff will post hearing logistics and a formal notice of proposed action; the board will consider any submitted language and public comment at a subsequent meeting following the hearing.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal