Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Regional rail-crossing study presented to Moorhead council; BNSF to provide local match, consultants outline turn-lane and overpass options

November 12, 2025 | Moorhead, Clay County, Minnesota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Regional rail-crossing study presented to Moorhead council; BNSF to provide local match, consultants outline turn-lane and overpass options
Moorhead — A regional rail-crossing needs study produced with HDR and local stakeholders was presented to the Moorhead City Council on Nov. 10, outlining safety and access improvements at 15 crossings in the metro area.

HDR representatives said the study grew from a BNSF inquiry nearly three years ago and included engineers from HDR’s national offices and a study review committee composed of local jurisdictions and regional stakeholders. "BNSF agreed to provide the local match for this study," one presenter said, noting that local jurisdictions were relieved of covering the typical 20% local match for federal funding.

Presenters described preferred alternatives identified by a multiple-account evaluation that weighted project benefits and emergency-service access. Recommended improvements at several crossings included adding turn lanes and shoulders for bicyclists and pedestrians, raising medians and installing new gates and flashers to meet quiet-zone standards, and constructing grade separations (overpasses) at the busiest locations to eliminate at-grade crossings and prepare for future growth.

The consultants said the study included public engagement — pop-up events and four regional meetings — and that the council was receiving the report during the final week of public comment. HDR asked the community to review the online study materials and submit recordable comments during the engagement period.

Council members asked about cost differences shown on the study graphics between options labeled with different dollar signs; HDR said it would follow up with specific cost-range information after the meeting. No formal action or funding vote was taken; the presentation was informational and part of ongoing regional planning.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Minnesota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI