Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Cranford board: engineer finds key site-plan numbers unreliable; applicant told to resubmit
Summary
At a June hearing, the applicant's civil engineer told the Cranford Board of Adjustment that impervious-coverage, building-coverage and some grade/height figures on the submitted plans could not be certified; the board said corrected, certified plans must be filed before the application proceeds.
At a June 26 meeting of the Cranford Board of Adjustment, civil engineer Thomas Quinn told the board he could not certify several pivotal site-plan numbers on the application and that the applicant must return with corrected, certified materials.
Quinn, accepted by the board as an expert, displayed a revised site plan dated 06/26/2025 and said the building footprint has been moved forward so the nearest setback is now about 26.13 feet from the rear property line (previously about 6.72 feet). He also gave measurements of side-yard distances and the closest point to the public park path (85.42 feet).
But Quinn said he…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
