The Building and Standards Commission reviewed subcommittee recommendations to change permit-expiration timelines and to add a documented-hardship exemption that would pause or extend permit time limits. Subcommittee chair Commissioner Laura Sauter summarized the proposal to separate permit timelines by square footage: permits for structures 5,000 square feet or smaller would move from 12 to 18 months; permits for structures larger than 5,000 square feet would have 24 months from approval.
Commissioners pressed staff on operational details: what triggers the 90-day commencement clock, how inspectors will record a valid start, and how hardship claims will be demonstrated and appealed. Mitch Richard, the city’s chief building official, said an actual inspection entry will stop the 90-day clock and that staff currently track these matters manually while a new system is expected to improve monitoring. He also outlined an enforcement timeline: photographic documentation and initial letters for top violations were planned to be issued around Nov. 20, with some staff suggesting delivery after Thanksgiving.
On who decides hardship requests, commissioners debated whether the Building and Standards Commission should review claims or whether determinations should be administrative. The commission adopted a consensus to phrase the ordinance 'as determined by the building official,' making hardship decisions administrative with appeals or procedures to be clarified in follow-up drafts. Members asked staff to return with proposed appeal language and recommended standards for what constitutes a documented hardship — for example, serious health events or military deployment versus routine contractor/supply delays.
The subcommittee will refine the language and bring a cleaned red-line and supporting notes back to the commission in January, after the citywide code diagnostic is complete.