Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Manvel planners pause review of 47-acre retail PUD tied to Chapter 380 incentive
Summary
Commissioners reviewed a voluntary annexation and Planned Unit Development for roughly 47.3 acres at Kirby and Highway 6 tied to a performance-based Chapter 380 agreement; staff found the PUD feasible but asked for locational limits on certain uses and commissioners voted to table final recommendation pending revised documents.
Commissioners at the Manvel Planning & Zoning Commission meeting on Oct. 27 reviewed a developer’s petition to annex about 47.3 acres near the northwest corner of Kirby Drive and State Highway 6 and adopt a Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning document tied to a Chapter 380 economic incentive agreement.
Planning staff told the commission that the PUD application is for voluntary annexation of land currently in the extraterritorial jurisdiction and that staff considers the PUD conceptually feasible but has sent a list of changes and locational criteria the applicant should address before a final recommendation. Staff said a traffic impact analysis (TIA) was submitted and that some uses included in the PUD currently would normally require separate specific-use permits or locational controls.
“The PUD document is the document that governs the development of that particular property,” planning staff said, noting that allowing certain uses “by right” in a PUD can permit multiple locations of uses such as gas stations unless the PUD includes limits on quantity and placement.
Developer Ryan Sweeney of BCS Capital Group, representing the applicant, described the project as a market-driven retail center that would rely on sales-tax-generating tenants and a performance-based Chapter 380 reimbursement. “It’s strictly performance based. If we don’t perform, it’s our risk,” Sweeney said, adding that roughly 17 of the 47 acres would be occupied by detention and be unusable for buildings.
Commissioners interrogated the PUD’s list of permitted uses — which as submitted included convenience stores, car washes, and other commercial categories — and pressed staff and the applicant to add locational criteria and numerical limits so the PUD would not automatically allow multiple facilities of the same type without further review. Staff recommended conditions and asked the applicant to provide a revised PUD document and a summary of changes.
Ian Knox of EHRA, the consultant who drafted the PUD, told the commission he would deliver an updated draft and a summary of edits within days to help expedite review while ensuring the document addressed staff’s substantive concerns.
Given the volume of comments and outstanding edits, the commission voted unanimously to table the final recommendation to city council and asked staff and the applicant to circulate a marked-up draft and summary for commissioners to review before the next meeting. The city will separately consider annexation and any Chapter 380 agreement at upcoming council meetings; staff warned those items are linked and likely to generate iterative review between PD&Z and council.
Next steps: Staff and the applicant will exchange revised PUD documents and an edit summary; PD&Z will revisit the item at a later meeting before forwarding a recommendation to Manvel City Council.
