Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Public commenters and staff press San Antonio to revisit Chapter 33 limousine rules

November 04, 2025 | San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Public commenters and staff press San Antonio to revisit Chapter 33 limousine rules
Public commenters on Oct. 7 urged the San Antonio Transportation & Infrastructure Committee to remove a long‑standing requirement that limousine operators maintain at least one 'stretch' limousine in their fleet, saying the mandate is costly, out of step with modern fleets and not required for public safety.

"San Antonio todavía requiere que sea, por lo menos, una... limusina stretch en su flotilla," said Michael Rojas during public comment, arguing the requirement creates a financial barrier for small operators and noting newer vehicles and technology can meet safety needs.

Staff briefing: Rick Riley, deputy director (police mention), summarized Chapter 33 of the city code that governs ground transportation permits, describing vehicle classes (stretch limousines, luxury SUVs, van limousines), permit renewal rules and vehicle‑age and mileage limits. "El capítulo 33 del código de la ciudad gobierna la operación de los vehículos para contratar y transporte de tierra y servicio en San Antonio," Riley said, and staff said there are about 116 limousine permits and 155 drivers currently registered.

Council reaction: Members asked for comparisons with other Texas cities. Staff told the committee that Austin requires either a stretch limousine or a set number of luxury vans, while Dallas and Corpus Christi have no minimum vehicle‑type requirement. Several councilmembers asked staff to collect stakeholder feedback, prepare draft language and return with a comparison of other cities’ rules and potential policy options. One councilmember emphasized safety and suggested mileage/age limits if the stretch requirement is removed.

Outcome: The item was presented for information only; no ordinance or motion to amend Chapter 33 was taken. Staff said they will gather additional stakeholder input and provide draft options for the committee’s consideration in early 2026.

Ending: Committee members welcomed the advisory board’s involvement and asked staff to return with model language, comparisons and outreach results before any formal ordinance change.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI