Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Car Wash Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reopens 401 North Ave. E. proposal for car wash, car‑detail and pet‑wash kiosk; hearing continued to Oct. 6
Summary
The board heard jurisdictional objections and extensive architectural testimony on a proposed car wash, detailing bay and pet‑wash kiosk at 401 North Avenue East. The board accepted applicant testimony and continued the application to Oct. 6, 2025 for traffic, noise and engineering witnesses.
Get email alerts on the Car Wash Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Cranford Zoning Board of Adjustment took extensive testimony on a resumed application for 401 North Avenue East on Aug. 11, hearing preliminary architectural, operational and site changes proposed by the applicant (materials list the owner as Mayrock Royalty/Mayrock Realty/Merock Realty). The application seeks to replace an existing retail/service garage with a car wash and detailing area, add a pet‑wash kiosk and make related site improvements at an existing fueling station.
A resident objected on res judicata grounds, citing a 2011 Sunoco application and a 21‑page resolution that denied a prior convenience‑store conversion. Resident Rita Labruto argued the new scheme is substantially similar and should be barred from relitigation. Board counsel reviewed case law and advised the board to apply the "substantially similar" test (Bridal/Usacheck cases) and noted that differences in ownership and proposed uses supported hearing the new application. The board found no jurisdictional bar and proceeded.
Applicant attorney Steven Hale and architect Jasvinder Arbajani presented revisions made after the June 23 hearing: the applicant reduced design variances, revised building materials and colors, added a small second‑story mechanical area to meet a two‑story ordinance requirement, moved vacuum stalls, added granite block curbing, added a bicycle rack and consolidated signage to one front‑facing 50‑sq.‑ft. sign. Testimony also covered operations: fueling hours proposed 5 a.m. to midnight; car wash, detailing and pet‑wash hours proposed 7 a.m. to 10 p.m.; staffing of one attendant in each operational area; scheduled fuel deliveries once a week; trash pickup once weekly; and a reclaim system maintenance schedule.
Neighbors questioned traffic queuing, lights, noise, pollution and snow storage; the applicant said the plan provides space for queuing (22 cars in the lane), evergreen screening and an 8‑foot fence along the residential edge, and proposed landscaping with both shade trees and year‑round screening. Board professionals asked for more detailed engineering, traffic and noise studies. The applicant confirmed those experts will testify at the continued hearing.
Given the volume of outstanding technical questions, the board and applicant agreed to continue the hearing to Oct. 6, 2025 and record an extension through Sept. 30 to preserve jurisdiction. The board directed the applicant to supply updated engineering, traffic and noise testimony and revised plans ahead of the next session.

