Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use And Taxation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission keeps existing recreational‑district rules on storage containers, sets valuation approach for water‑affected lots
Summary
After public input and staff discussion, Emmons County commissioners declined to change a resolution restricting Connex/storage containers in recreational (residential) districts and approved valuing permanently water‑affected lots at the county’s established permanent‑water valuation rather than a full 100% tax exemption.
Emmons County commissioners reviewed a letter and public concerns about Connex (shipping/storage) containers in recreational districts and decided not to amend the existing resolution restricting those structures in residential recreational lots.
During the discussion staff and commissioners noted the county previously held a public hearing on the issue in July 2022 and heard resident confusion about where the ordinance applies. Commissioners said the recreational district is largely residential and that allowing multiple containers or permitting containers used as building material would undermine neighborhood character. Several commissioners favored confronting any landowner application directly rather than reopening the ordinance now; one commissioner suggested a variance process where appropriate.
On a separate but related agenda item the board discussed tax treatment of land permanently affected by water. Staff and commissioners agreed that assigning a nominal per‑acre valuation consistent with existing county 'permanent water' values (examples raised in discussion: about $17–$18 per acre) would be preferable to attempting a percentage reduction or a 100% exemption that could cause data/reporting issues in the county tax system. The board made and seconded a motion to set the valuation approach for these lands to match the county’s permanent‑water valuation; the motion carried.
The meeting also included a resident appeal regarding a denied building permit and questions over whether parts of the resident’s property are inside the City of Linton limits or should be taxed by the county. The resident said the city denied his permit and referred to previous elevation surveys and FEMA floodplain mapping; commissioners and staff advised that a no‑rise certification for construction in a floodway would be required and that FEMA mapping changes several years ago altered what sites require such certification. County staff indicated the city serves as the floodplain coordinator in that area, and commissioners warned that building in the floodway without the required no‑rise certification could jeopardize flood insurance in the area.
The board did not take final action on the resident’s annexation question during the meeting but directed staff and the county attorney to review records and advised the resident to pursue petition or survey evidence if he intends to seek de‑annexation or tax relief.
