This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
The Board’s Enforcement & Compounding Committee spent substantial time reviewing 'duty to consult' requirements and hospital reporting obligations.
Deputy Executive Officer Julie Ansell walked members through CCR §1707.2 and committee discussions that flagged operational barriers — chiefly lack of reimbursement and competing workflow demands — that make meaningful oral consultation difficult in some retail settings. Several board members favored moving toward a less prescriptive, standard‑of‑care approach that empowers pharmacists to use professional judgment; members also asked staff to consider limited exemptions for white‑bagging or closed‑door pharmacies and to research reimbursement pathways with DHCS and commercial payers.
Public commenters and industry representatives reiterated practical concerns. Laurie Walmsley (Walgreens) generally supported allowing technician offers to counsel in appropriate workflows. John Gray (Kaiser Permanente) and other hospital representatives asked the board to be cautious about mandating consultation where it could be paternalistic; several hospital commenters asked for clarity about CAMR (medication error reporting) obligations for inpatient hospital pharmacies.
On CAMR, the committee recommended a targeted regulatory amendment to CCR §1710 to explicitly reflect prior board intent: hospital pharmacies meeting subdivision (a) are not to be treated as community pharmacies required to register for CAMR. The committee asked staff to bring draft language and the possible motion to the full board; staff noted attachment materials with proposed text.
What happens next: The committee will continue work, draft proposed regulatory edits for CCR §1710 and draft FAQ/education materials clarifying consultation expectations and CAMR applicability. Staff also flagged ongoing outreach to payers and technology stakeholders to address documentation and reimbursement barriers.
Key public comments
• Multiple pharmacists and system safety officers urged preserving consultation but making compliance operationally feasible; several recommended better documentation tools and payer engagement. • CPHA (Sean Kim) urged alignment with AB1503 implementation and the standard‑of‑care transition.
Closing note: The committee will continue the topic in future meetings and may propose rulemaking or guidance depending on staff recommendations.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,164 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund within 30 days if not a fit