Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Clovis approves two short-term rental conditional uses; staff to pursue business-license and lodgers-tax compliance
Summary
The Clovis Municipal Commission approved conditional-use permits for two short-term rentals and directed staff to develop a business-license process that will include lodgers-tax compliance and registration of existing units.
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Clovis Municipal Commission approved conditional-use permits for two properties to operate as short-term rentals and discussed next steps for citywide regulation, licensing and lodgers-tax compliance.
Staff presentation and approvals Tom Hovalt, city planning staff, told the commission the unified development ordinance now allows short-term rentals to be conditionally approved in any zone and presented two applications: 3028 Cheyenne Drive (Cheyenne Meadows Unit 2) and 2037 Hull Street (Western Hills Block 2 Lot 26 plus 1 foot of Lot 25). Hovalt said required notifications were completed and staff received no objections to either application.
“We realize that there's already existing short term rentals… we actually have probably about 40 or so, based off my Internet research, within the community,” Hovalt said, describing a planned compliance path of conditional-use approvals and a forthcoming annual business-license process tied to lodgers-tax reporting.
Policy and enforcement discussion Commissioners pressed staff on possible conditions the commission could attach to approvals. Hovalt said the commission can impose conditions — for example a one-year term on a conditional use — but cautioned that many operational restrictions (annual renewal, vehicle or occupancy caps, neighborhood notification, maintenance standards) are typically handled through a business-license program and code language applied uniformly rather than as one-off conditions.
Hovalt summarized relevant code provisions: an approved conditional use will lapse and become void one year after approval unless a permit has been issued and the project has commenced; approved conditional uses run with the land and are not affected by changes of tenancy, ownership or management; and amendments to approved conditional uses must follow the full conditional-use application process, including fees and notices.
Commissioner questions focused on enforceability. A commissioner asked whether the city can cap the number of vehicles for a short-term rental in a residential area; staff responded that vehicle and occupancy limits are possible but often hard to police and are usually complaint-driven. Staff suggested advertising occupancy limits (for example, two adults per bedroom) and relying on complaint-based enforcement and business-license revocation in persistent cases.
Next steps The commission voted to approve the Cheyenne Drive conditional use (moved by Vice Chair Klein) and then approved the Hull Street conditional use; both passed by voice vote with no recorded opposition. Staff said it will reach out to existing short-term rental operators to require registration and, once the business-license process is drafted, require annual licenses and lodgers-tax reporting. Hovalt said staff is considering UDO text amendments to codify elements of the business-license and permitting process and will bring proposed language to a future meeting; no date for an amendment hearing was set.
What this means locally Property owners approved today may operate as short-term rentals under the conditional uses granted by the municipal commission; they should expect to register with the city and apply for a business license once the licensing process is in place. Existing short-term rentals that were not previously processed should expect outreach from staff and potential registration and tax-filing requirements.
The commission did not impose a uniform cap or set of operational conditions at the meeting; instead, members signaled a preference for using an annual business-license framework and for drafting code language to address common enforcement questions in a consistent way.
