Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Utah Supreme Court hears argument on whether state constitution protects a common-law "right to resist" unlawful searches
Summary
David Ferguson, counsel for the defendant, asked the Utah Supreme Court to recognize a common-law right under the Utah Constitution allowing resistance to unlawful searches; Jeff Mann, for the State, urged the court to avoid a new constitutional holding and said the record shows a warrant and only limited remedies.
David Ferguson, counsel for defendant Leslie Abner, urged the Utah Supreme Court to recognize a common-law "right to resist" unlawful searches and seizures rooted in the state constitution and historical practice. "There's a common law right to resist unlawful searches and seizures," Ferguson told the justices, arguing that in some circumstances that right should operate like self-defense and could justify either a jury instruction or, in narrow cases with undisputed facts, judicial suppression of evidence.
Jeff Mann, representing the State of Utah, pushed back that the court need not reach a broad constitutional holding to resolve this appeal. He told the court the simplest disposition would be to affirm because officers had a warrant here: "The easiest way for this court to dispose of this appeal and affirm the conviction is by saying, the police had a warrant, therefore, the…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

