Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Facilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
McPherson County commissioners approve purchase of former city building in 3–2 vote
Summary
The McPherson County Board approved a contract for deed to buy a former city building after debate over needed repairs and future use; the 3–2 roll call drew public criticism that money from truck fees should instead have funded County Road 23 repairs.
McPherson County commissioners voted 3–2 to purchase a former city building under a contract for deed after a lengthy discussion about repairs, fire-marshal recommendations and long-term maintenance.
Chair (S1) opened discussion on the contract for deed, noting the city had already completed several repairs to the building, including boiler work and concrete. After discussion of outstanding items from the fire marshal, Commissioner Newhart moved to approve the purchase; the motion was seconded and carried on a roll-call vote recorded by the chair: Martian — Nay; Newhart — Yes; Reichard — Nay; Wallah — Yes; one additional yes on the record produced a 3–2 majority and the purchase carried.
Public commenter Mike (S5) urged the commission to prioritize road repairs funded by truck fees, telling commissioners, “we should use that money for that road rather than for that building.” Commissioners repeatedly acknowledged those concerns but said the building purchase addressed an immediate facilities need and that fire-marshal items would be handled as part of the transaction.
County staff and the sheriff’s office described routine maintenance needs (lift/ADA repairs, roof/ceiling tile issues) and clarified budget impacts. Commissioners approved the purchase while directing staff to track needed improvements and provide cost estimates for repairs and long‑term upkeep.
The county will finalize closing under the contract-for-deed terms; staff will return with a detailed schedule of required improvements and estimated costs.
