Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Appeals court hears dispute over manslaughter instruction and coconspirator hearsay in Muscaritolo case
Summary
The court heard oral argument in docket SJC13575, Commonwealth v. Michael Muscaritolo, where defense attorney Patty De Junius urged reversal of all convictions or, at minimum, a remand for a manslaughter jury instruction.
The court heard oral argument in docket SJC13575, Commonwealth v. Michael Muscaritolo, where defense attorney Patty De Junius urged reversal of all convictions or, at minimum, a remand for a manslaughter jury instruction. De Junius told the court the record supports a view that Muscaritolo played a different, more passive role than the other two co-defendants and that "a juror could at least infer that he was the one who was doing the stealing while the other two were in the main part of the house."
De Junius focused on sequencing and scene evidence: she pointed to the location of bloody shoe prints, the frying pan with blood drips found in the master bedroom, and blood smears in drawers and a closet to argue a juror reasonably could find Muscaritolo arrived after the principal violence and was engaged in theft rather than the assault. "So I think…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

