Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board schedules public hearings for three rezoning requests, including NC‑210 corridor parcel

Harnett County Board of Commissioners · November 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Development Services briefed the board on three rezoning cases and asked that each be scheduled for public hearing on Nov. 17.

Harnett County Development Services presented three rezoning cases for the board to schedule public hearings on Nov. 17.

Miss Arber described plan25090001, a request by applicant Greg Bagley to rezone approximately 6.2 acres at the NC‑210 South/Shawtown Road intersection from RA‑20R (Residential‑Agricultural) to Commercial; staff noted the site is near a recent satellite annexation by Lillington and that the rezoning would require a concurrent land‑use designation amendment to Commercial Mixed Use. The planning board recommended approval; no public opposition was reported at the planning board meeting.

The second case (plan25090002) is a county‑initiated rezoning for properties on Old NC‑87 that currently show as Commercial; staff explained the 2000 zoning rollout apparently left some parcels misclassified and many owners requested residential zoning. Staff conducted mailings and door‑to‑door contact so eligible owners could opt to be rezoned to RA‑20R. The board agreed to place the item on the public hearing docket.

The third case (plan25100001) is a request from 4C Development LLC to rezone 5.32 acres at Ray Road and McKay Drive in Anderson Creek Township from RA‑20M to Commercial. Staff noted available water and sewer service, the site's location near other commercial zoning, and that the parcel is in the military corridor overlay so Fort Bragg review (RULAC) was used; staff recommended and the planning board recommended approval conditioned on the land‑use amendment.

Ending: The board directed staff to add all three items to next week's public hearing agenda; no rezoning decisions were made at this meeting.