Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council accepts Equal Rights Commission short‑term rental report, refers draft ordinance to staff after hours of public testimony
Summary
After hours of public testimony from STR owners, workers and neighbors, the council accepted the Equal Rights Commission’s advisory report and asked staff to draft an STR ordinance for a Nov. 17 planning commission public hearing.
The Green Bay Common Council voted Nov. 11 to accept the Equal Rights Commission’s advisory report on short‑term rental (STR) regulation and to ask city staff to draft an ordinance for the planning commission that would return for public hearing Nov. 17. The action followed more than three hours of public comment in council chambers from STR owners, managers, employees and neighbors.
The ERC’s report recommends a package of tools to address the city’s housing needs. Commissioners emphasized that the report is advisory and based on community testimony and local housing‑study findings. Commission chair Tara told the council the recommendations aim to balance entrepreneurship and housing stability.
Speakers in favor of restrictions — including ERC commissioners and housing advocates — argued STR proliferation reduces housing availability and accelerates price pressures. John Shelton, an ERC commissioner, cited the city’s housing study and urged measures to “arrest the continued increase” of STRs.
Operators and many small hosts testified they rely on STR income to pay mortgages and support local jobs. They warned that a 7‑night minimum and a 180‑day annual cap would eliminate many small operators and their local employees, and they proposed alternatives such as targeted enforcement, fee‑based funds for housing, and a progressive “three‑strike” enforcement regime to remove bad actors while preserving responsible hosts.
Council action: the council accepted the ERC report but carved out specific items for later consideration, referring a staff‑draft ordinance to the planning commission and requesting that staff consider community feedback, potential grandfathering, enforcement mechanics and alternative policy tools. Council members explicitly discussed proposals that staff will analyze: a potential 180‑day annual cap, a minimum‑stay requirement (6–7 nights in drafts under discussion), permit/fee changes and a three‑strike enforcement option.
What happens next: staff will prepare a draft ordinance and supporting analysis for the Nov. 17 planning commission public hearing; additional council deliberation and possible amendments will follow. The council stressed that any final legal restrictions must conform to state law and may be subject to change if state legislation returns local control.
