Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council initiates T District follow-up study and advances Mississippi River Corridor zoning updates

Saint Paul City Council · November 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After adopting a Traditional Neighborhood District ordinance, the council approved a resolution to begin a T District follow-up and transit corridor study and moved first-reading MRCA zoning amendments forward (MRCA laid over for DNR review; vote on MRCA amendment 6–1).

The council took multiple land-use steps Nov. 5, advancing work on T Districts and river-corridor zoning.

Councilmember Jost introduced a resolution to initiate a T District follow-up and transit corridor zoning study in response to public comments. The resolution directs staff to further examine issues raised during the T District adoption, including whether storage should be allowed as a use in T Districts. The council adopted that resolution 7–0.

Planning staff presented a first-reading ordinance to update Saint Paul’s Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCA) regulations to comply with the state’s 2017 MRCA rules and a 2019 model ordinance. Planner Mr. Johnson summarized the changes: creation of six new overlay districts with varying setbacks and height limits, conditional use permit requirements for some height and bluff protections, and additional vegetation and stormwater standards. He said DNR final approval will be required after council action and that staff initiated a separate study on bird-safe glass provisions, aiming to return within a year.

The council moved a scrivener’s-correction version of the MRCA ordinance; the amendment was approved and the ordinance was laid over for second reading and DNR review with a recorded vote of 6 in favor and 1 opposed (Council Member Buie).