DPW presents new snow‑removal policy; Board votes to operate under it pending formal adoption and approves residential contractor awards
Loading...
Summary
The Board of Public Works heard a proposed DPW snow‑response policy that sets plow thresholds (priority 2 at 2 inches, priority 3 at 4 inches), debated whether to delay a vote, agreed to operate under the policy pending a special meeting, and approved five two‑year residential snow‑plowing contracts to expand neighborhood coverage.
Todd Wilson, director and chairman of the Board of Public Works, presented the Department of Public Works' updated snow‑response policy and an implementation plan that sets priority 2 streets to be plowed at a 2‑inch threshold and priority 3 residential streets at a 4‑inch threshold. Wilson said the changes were driven by "proposal number 69, 2025" and an ordinance amendment to "chapter 6 21, article 3" that requires the department to publish a priority network for bike infrastructure and present the policy to the City‑County Council public works committee.
Wilson told the board DPW reviewed 45 years of snowfall records and operational data, and described department resources: "We have approximately 95 people on our union staff per shift to manage a snow fight" (about 70 drivers, 15 laborers and nine heavy equipment operators) and seven salt barns, one of which is under repair after storm damage. He also summarized contractor costs and retention: "it costs about 700,000 to 1,300,000.0 to deploy 1 snow event with our snow contractors," and said contractors are generally used for single‑pass, passable lanes in neighborhoods rather than curb‑to‑curb work.
Deputy Director Lacey Johnson answered operational questions from board members, saying crews were active during the recent weekend event: "We had cruise out Sunday at 11AM all the way through Monday." Board members pressed for more data, including comparisons to peer cities and how the Snow Force Viewer will display clearing status; Wilson and staff agreed to provide additional information on staffing benchmarks and equipment needs for protected bike lanes.
One board member moved to table the policy to allow more time to review the materials, noting the packet had arrived only about half an hour before the meeting. City‑code timing for the council presentation prompted legal and procedural discussion; staff advised the plan must be presented to the public works committee on Nov. 20, which would require either a special Board of Public Works meeting or provisional action in the interim. The board ultimately voted to "operate under the new snow policy" immediately while scheduling a special meeting for formal adoption. The motion to operate under the presented policy passed on a voice vote.
At the meeting's walk‑on portion, Sam Barris, DPW chief financial officer, asked the board to award five two‑year contracts for residential snow plowing (RFB 14DPW1745) to ClearPath Facilities Services LLC, Shareco Snow LLC, Raskin Associates, Inc., Jay Yarling, and Ram Lawn Care. Barris said contractors were evaluated by per‑mile pricing, equipment inventories and capacity to cover assigned townships across roughly 2,000 centerline miles. "We are moving forward with awarding contracts to 5 different companies," he said. Members asked about contractor oversight and quality monitoring; staff said assignments by township plus tracking data and resident complaints would inform future procurement decisions.
Next steps: DPW will provide requested follow‑up details to the board on peer staffing comparisons, equipment needs for protected bike lanes and the Snow Force Viewer display; the board will call a special meeting to formally adopt the policy prior to or coordinated with the City‑County Council public works committee presentation.
