Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Bridge Errors And Omissions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Adams County committee directs staff to send errors-and-omissions letter on County J bridge project

Adams County Highway Committee · November 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Adams County Highway Committee approved staff drafting and sending an errors-and-omissions notice to the design consultant for the County Trunk Highway J bridge after staff cited miscalculated quantities, incorrect rebar lengths and omitted items; change orders 1–6 total about $27,000 on an ~$800,000 bridge.

The Adams County Highway Committee voted to have staff prepare and forward an errors-and-omissions letter to the design consultant for the County Trunk Highway J bridge project, after staff described calculation errors and missing items on the bridge plans.

Pat, highway department staff, told the Committee the draft letter is intended to put the consultant on notice and to preserve the county’s ability to seek reimbursement for recoverable costs. He said the project has generated change orders 1 through 6 totaling about $27,000 on an approximately $800,000 bridge; examples cited included incorrect rebar lengths, miscalculated concrete quantities for abutments and items that did not appear on the plans such as beam guard removal.

The motion to prepare and forward the letter was made and seconded and passed by voice vote. Pat clarified that preparing the letter does not obligate the county to pursue a formal claim and that DOT oversight may identify recoverable costs; he said staff could not yet estimate a recoverable dollar amount while the project remains in progress.

Committee members asked whether county employee time would be recoverable; Pat said county staff had not logged extra time on the issue and that potential recoveries would likely be through DOT review. Pat warned the project remains ongoing, and decisions about formal recovery of costs would follow further analysis.

The Committee’s action directs staff to coordinate with DOT and finalize the E&O letter for the consultant; no payment or further commitment was made at the meeting.