Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Overview topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kodiak planning staff outlines Title 17 zoning basics and history at Nov. 12 work session
Summary
Community Development Director Chris French walked the Planning and Zoning Commission through an overview of Title 17, the borough zoning code, and an educational video on U.S. zoning history — highlighting code components, district types, and options such as form-based and incentive zoning.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Overview topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chris French, the Kodiak Island Borough community development director, told the Planning and Zoning Commission at its Nov. 12 work session that zoning “regulates land use with the typical public purpose of protecting health, safety, and welfare of the community.” The presentation began with an educational video that traced U.S. zoning history and explained the three standard parts of a zoning code: the map, the use table and development standards.
French said Title 17, the borough’s zoning code, contains 46 chapters and 19 zoning districts, from primary residential districts (R1, R2, R3, RSL) to wilderness and conservation districts. He summarized typical standards included in the code — setbacks, building heights, lot coverage, signs and parking — and described special standards such as accessory dwelling units, communications towers and recreational vehicle parks.
The presentation placed the code in historical context, citing landmark court rulings and critiques of exclusionary zoning. French described alternatives being used elsewhere — form-based codes that regulate building form rather than use, and incentive zoning that encourages particular outcomes such as affordable housing through bonuses. He said the borough’s Title 17 generally follows the standard structure of map, use table and development standards and that changes can be made incrementally to address local priorities.
Commissioners asked technical questions about minimum lot sizes and code cross-references; French corrected an apparent mishearing about institutional minimum lot size and said staff would add the additional setback section (17.155.010) to the next week’s staff report for clarity. The presentation concluded with commissioners expressing appreciation for the educational briefing and video.

