Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the 225 Indian Avenue topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Authority debates enforcement options for disputed fence and RV at 225 Indian Ave.; ownership unclear

Town of Sellersburg Unsafe Building Authority · November 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members said an investigator has been assigned to a complaint about an RV and fence at 225 Indian Avenue but that unclear ownership complicates enforcement options.

The Town of Sellersburg Unsafe Building Authority discussed allegations of an unsafe RV and a disputed fence at 225 Indian Avenue on Nov. 13, with members uncertain who owns the fence and divided on whether the issue warrants enforcement action.

Speaker 3 said staff had received a complaint and assigned an investigator, and that he and other staff had driven by the property. “I don't know if it's truly been determined if this is a justifiable, unsafe condition, or if it should be handled civilly between the concerned property owner and the business,” Speaker 3 said, describing the factual uncertainty. Speaker 4 added that paperwork from a prior meeting left the ownership unclear: “No 1 really knows who owns the fence...There was an agreement years and years and years ago.”

Several members suggested the board could let the parties resolve the fence ownership, while noting the board has seen worse fences around town; one speaker recommended letting the parties work it out rather than pursuing enforcement. Potential litigation was mentioned; the board discussed scheduling an executive session later in the agenda to consider legal options and clarified the need to stop public recording before entering any executive session.

No formal enforcement action or vote was recorded at the Nov. 13 meeting; staff will continue investigation and the board may revisit the matter after further fact-finding.