Fluvanna School Board presses for more staff as chronic absenteeism worsens
Loading...
Summary
After a detailed presentation, school officials and a prosecutor warned that chronic absenteeism remains high and costly; the board discussed hiring two half‑time attendance aides and using carryover funds during the FY27 budget process.
Chair and school leaders devoted the longest portion of the meeting to attendance after a presentation from the division’s mental health and outreach team.
Caitlin, the district mental health coordinator, told the board that “a student is considered chronically absent if he or she misses an average of 2 or more instructional days per month,” and laid out how the division distinguishes chronic absenteeism from truancy and from excused absences. The presentation explained that, by the tenth unexcused absence, staff aim to convene an attendance improvement plan with family, counselors and school staff to identify barriers and supports.
The superintendent and attendance team described layered interventions — automated calls, home visits, a district multidisciplinary attendance team, targeted school‑level outreach and an attendance buyback option at the high school — and warned capacity is constrained. Board members asked what extra staff would accomplish if the supervisors approve two half‑time positions the board has proposed in a carryover request; presenters said additional staff would expand morning outreach and home visits and free the mental‑health team to focus on prevention and other programs.
In a public comment that followed, Amanda Galloway, an assistant commonwealth’s attorney, urged investment in prevention and cited startling rates for economically disadvantaged students in 2023–24: “For eighth graders that are economically disadvantaged, the chronic absenteeism rate was 43.4 percent,” and she said senior‑year rates reached as high as 66.3 percent. Galloway also highlighted the fiscal argument for prevention, noting state Children’s Services Act figures that place foster‑care and residential costs in the tens of thousands per child.
Board members repeatedly framed the issue as both a capacity and funding problem. The superintendent told the board that some solutions — such as a female wrestling team pilot or added curriculum purchases — may require capital or one‑time costs; board members asked for clearer estimates to take to the Board of Supervisors during the December 3 joint meeting and the FY27 budget process.
Next steps: the board will present the carryover request and the justification for two half‑time attendance positions to the Board of Supervisors at the December 3 meeting and continue budget deliberations this winter.
