Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press questions about Bragg Park improvements, monument removal and housing set-aside policy
Summary
Public commenters asked why Bragg Park electricity and a small monument were removed ahead of construction and criticized a developer plan for three high-priced homes; a resident argued the city's 15%/20% affordable set-aside rules discourage denser, lower-cost housing.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At the Nov. 6 meeting several public commenters raised questions about Bragg Park renovations and city housing policy.
One resident asked why Bragg Park’s holiday electricity had been cut and why a small monument previously at the park was taken down; the mayor said power had been removed during construction work, that events had been redirected to a downtown location for better access, and that the small monument was removed for protection and will be stored while a larger commemorative sign will be placed on the new concession stand. The mayor described the concession stand as a "grab-and-go" operation that will not compete with nearby hot-food restaurants and said the bus stop adjacent to the location will remain in place.
In a separate public comment Josef Wolf described a pending subdivision application for a 20,000‑square‑foot corner lot that a developer wants to build out as three single-family homes priced at about $1.6 million each. Wolf argued the city’s recently adopted affordability set-asides — a 15% requirement for multifamily projects and a 20% requirement for five or more units — can make higher-density projects financially unworkable and thus lead to more expensive single‑family homes. He urged the council to reconsider whether the 20% set-aside for developments over five units is appropriate when few new housing projects are moving forward.
Council did not take immediate action on zoning or set-aside policy at the meeting; the comments were recorded during public comment.

