Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Governance Appointments topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council reappoints two TIF commissioners after heated exchange over public comments by an appointee

Board of Aldermen, City of Branson, Missouri · October 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The mayor nominated Gary Groman and James Dewsbury for reappointment to the Branson Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Commission. Alderman Schultz moved to remove Groman from the nomination, citing public comments made as a member of the press while also serving as an appointee; the motion to remove failed 2–4. The board then approved both reappoint

Mayor presented two reappointments to the Branson TIF Commission — Gary Groman and James Dewsbury. Alderman Glenn Schultz objected to reappointing Groman on the grounds that Groman, who also works as a local reporter, had used public comment periods to criticize and cast aspersions on aldermen; Schultz argued that this behavior was inappropriate for someone serving as a city appointee and moved to remove Groman from the nomination.

Several aldermen and the mayor replied that the roles are distinct: the mayor and others emphasized the professional service Groman has provided on the Planning & Zoning Commission and the value of public comment by citizens. Alderman Lucas and others countered that an appointee must understand the dual nature of speaking as a citizen while serving on city commissions. The amendment to delete Groman from the appointment failed on a 2–4 vote. The board subsequently approved the original appointments (reappointments of Groman and Dewsbury) by roll call (5–1).

No code change was adopted; the discussion focused on norms for appointed commissioners and the interplay between free speech in public comment and expectations for appointees. The mayor and other members urged respect for public comment; others urged that appointees temper public testimony where it conflicts with their appointed role.