Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council pulls proposed historic‑preservation amendments after public opposition and staff update
Summary
After public comment and a staff briefing, council voted 4–3 to delete proposed amendments to City Code 20.2 (historic landmark preservation) rather than advance them. The Downtown Management District and property owners had raised concerns about owner consent and "demolition by neglect" provisions.
El Paso City Council on Tuesday removed proposed changes to City Code 20.2 (historic landmark preservation) from consideration after mixed public feedback and debate.
Background: City staff had proposed a set of amendments intended to clarify designation procedures, introduce a demolition‑by‑neglect enforcement tool and adjust consent processes. The Downtown Management District (DMD) and several property‑owner representatives urged council to delay the changes, saying the proposals risked creating duplicative enforcement burdens and permitting designations without owner consent.
Public testimony: Joe Gudenrath, executive director of the Downtown Management District, told council the DMD participated in staff outreach but remained opposed to key sections, particularly designation without owner consent and a demolition‑by‑neglect mechanism. Gudenrath said existing city code and vigorous code enforcement should address deterioration and that additional historic‑specific enforcement would create a second, duplicative layer.
Council action: Mayor Pro Tem Chavez moved to delete the item from the agenda. The motion passed 4–3 after council debate about outreach and the need for further consensus; councilmembers in the minority said they wanted more discussion with stakeholders rather than an immediate deletion.
Quote (from meeting transcript): —On behalf of the downtown management Board of Directors ... I ask you to vote down these amendments until we can build consensus on the best strategies to preserve, protect and rehabilitate our historic properties,— Joe Gudenrath said.
Next steps: Staff said they will record public feedback and may return with revised language; council asked for continued outreach to build consensus among property owners, preservation advocates and city departments before forwarding code changes.
