Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
Rhinebeck board tables parking-penalty changes after debate over fines and incarceration language
Loading...
Summary
The board continued the vehicle-and-traffic public hearing and tabled decisions on the proposed parking penalty schedule after extended debate about fine levels, enforcement practicality and whether incarceration should be allowed; the draft’s incarceration language was removed and the board scheduled an attorney-client meeting with counsel for a,
The Rhinebeck Town Board continued its public hearing on proposed vehicle-and-traffic changes and tabled final decisions on a proposed parking-penalty schedule after an extended discussion on Oct. 27. The board agreed to return to the matter after further consultation with town counsel and to continue the public hearing to Nov. 24.
Board members debated proposed fines included in the draft local law. The draft under consideration set a first offense at $100, a second offense (within 18 months) at $200, and a third offense at $450 to $900. Several members criticized the scale as "high" and urged smaller minimums; one board member argued a lower minimum would improve collections because justices might otherwise dismiss extreme fines.
Members also objected to the inclusion of incarceration language. On advice of counsel the board struck phrases authorizing imprisonment "for not more than 5 days," and several members said incarceration for parking violations should not be included. The board agreed to table the item so staff and counsel could refine the fee schedule, reset the recurrence lookback period if appropriate, and clarify administrative procedures for ticketing and tow/impound charges.
Supervisor Joan said she would schedule an attorney-client session with Michael Barfield so the board could resolve legal and administrative questions. The board also asked staff to circulate proposed edits and for members to discuss changes via email before the next public hearing.

