Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Campus Storage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District reviews campus storage options, from metal sheds to pole barns
Summary
Dr. Patrick Winters presented a campus‑wide inventory of sheds and proposed options including metal storage units, shipping containers and pole barns. The presentation included cost ranges, durability tradeoffs, relocation flexibility and a recommendation for the Buildings & Grounds committee to visit examples and develop a standard approach.
Schuylkill Valley School District staff presented photos and an inventory of the district's campus sheds and storage buildings and reviewed options to replace or standardize the cluster of existing structures.
Dr. Patrick Winters led the presentation and showed multiple existing sheds that vary in size, age and condition. He told the board the district currently operates six sheds supporting high school and junior high athletics (softball, field hockey, two track sheds, tennis and a concessions equipment shed) and two used by youth sports organizations.
Winters outlined several replacement options and their tradeoffs. Small metal storage units or shipping containers were presented as relatively low‑cost, relocatable options (the consultant estimated about $3,500 to $4,000 each for containers). A larger pre‑engineered pole‑barn approach was put forward as a more permanent solution at a higher cost; estimated pole‑barn pricing ranged from about $22,000 to $30,000 with a vendor quote cited near $24,000 but additional site prep, slab and utilities would add cost.
Board members raised operational concerns: shipping containers can experience interior condensation and are tightly sealed; a single centralized building might not serve fields dispersed across a large campus; better shelving and organization could reduce space needs. Several members urged on‑site visits to districts that have implemented metal sheds and pole barns, and Winters recommended convening the Buildings & Grounds committee for follow‑up.
No procurement action was taken. Winters said next steps should include committee site visits, clarifying placement relative to the proposed field house, and evaluating whether older wood sheds could be sold or repurposed to offset replacement costs.
