Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Elections Charter topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council holds hearing on possible ballot measure to allow district elections, add vice mayor and expand council

Lancaster City Council · October 29, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The city attorney held an informational hearing on a proposed charter amendment that would authorize Lancaster to add a vice mayor, increase council membership and permit district-based council elections; no action was taken.

Lancaster's city attorney held a public hearing to inform the community about a proposed ballot measure that would amend the city charter to authorize three potential changes: increase the number of council members from four to five, add the office of vice mayor, and permit the council to adopt district-based elections consistent with the California Voting Rights Act.

Allison, the city attorney, explained the hearing was informational only and that the council must conduct two public hearings and observe a statutory waiting period before it may consider placing a charter amendment before voters. She described the proposed charter language as permissive: it would authorize the council to adopt an ordinance effecting the changes if voters approve the charter amendment; it would not itself implement districting.

The attorney also said the proposal was in part a risk-management response to litigation under the California Voting Rights Act, noting that jurisdictions sued under that law have struggled to defend at trial and that attorney-fee awards in some cases have reached as high as $15 million. "Not a single public agency has successfully defended against such a lawsuit," Allison said, summarizing statewide litigation experience cited in the staff report.

Councilmembers and members of the public asked procedural questions about timing, how districts and at-large offices would interact, and the scheduling of future hearings. Allison said the city expects to return to council in December for a second hearing and could present the question for council action on placing a measure on the ballot at the first meeting in January 2026, subject to the required notice periods.

No action was taken at this meeting.