Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Shoreline Permit Sadf2506017 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves seawall replacement permit for Big Sand Lake property (SADF2506017)
Summary
Orange County commissioners approved a shoreline alteration permit Oct. 28 to replace a deteriorated seawall on Big Sand Lake (permit SADF2506017) after staff found the replacement would be landward of an existing conservation buffer and consistent with county standards.
Get email alerts on the Shoreline Permit Sadf2506017 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Orange County Board of County Commissioners on Oct. 28 approved a shoreline alteration dredge and fill permit (SADF2506017) allowing replacement of a vinyl seawall along roughly 129 feet of the western shoreline of Big Sand Lake.
The environmental programs administrator, Tom Hall, told the board the existing concrete wall (approximately 100 feet) appeared to date from the late 1990s and no enforcement action was pursued. The proposed wall would be landward of a platted conservation buffer easement (dedicated to Orange County and the South Florida Water Management District) and landward of the lake’s normal high‑water elevation.
Conditions and findings: EPD staff said abundant shoreline vegetation meant no additional required plantings; riprap will be installed and placed landward of the conservation easement per the plans. Staff found the application consistent with Orange County Code chapter 15, article 6 and section 15‑2‑18 standards and received no objections from notified neighbors.
Board action: Commissioner Wilson moved approval and Commissioner Scott seconded; the motion passed unanimously.
Quote: Tom Hall summarized the application scope and staff’s recommendation: the permit “is consistent with section 15‑2‑18” and staff requested approval subject to conditions listed in the staff report.
Ending: Staff said the applicant’s agent could not attend because of injury; the county will issue the permit subject to the conditions included in the staff report and noted this is in District 1.

