Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Hangar Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission revisits hangar buildout options, FAA constraints and aesthetic guidance
Summary
Commissioners reviewed hangar buildout options and reaffirmed a preference for consistent hangar design while asking staff to explore whether smaller hangars can be sited outside FAA building‑restriction areas.
Commission members spent a lengthy portion of the Oct. 27 meeting on hangar development and master‑plan options.
Staff reported ongoing work on a hanger study and asked whether the commission still supported leaving a vacant slot next to proposed 8‑ or 10‑pack hangars for a conventional hangar or potential FBO use. Several commissioners voiced agreement that leaving the slot vacant for future flexibility made sense.
Commissioners compared local preferences with alternative approaches used at other airports. One model described from Waterville uses a grid of leased parcels where tenants build pole‑barn or metal buildings under lease terms; the town sets design and siding standards to maintain consistency. Commissioners said they prefer maintaining consistent, community‑appropriate hangar appearance rather than ad‑hoc boxes on the hillside.
The group discussed federal and town restrictions on so‑called "through‑the‑fence" arrangements and the BRL — the building restriction line. One commissioner explained the BRL as an obstruction‑free, sloped envelope drawn from the runway centerline: "Anything inside of that line cannot happen, and it's called the BRL." The commission recommended staff and the engineer examine whether smaller single‑aircraft hangars could be sited outside the BRL, particularly in areas downfield of the fuel tank and away from precision approach slopes.
No formal action was taken to change the master plan at the Oct. 27 meeting; commissioners directed staff to continue the hanger study and to bring cost and layout options back to the commission for review.
