Council fails to renew Cortex blight determination after close vote

Board of Aldermen, City of St. Louis · October 25, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A final passage motion to renew prior blighting determinations for the Cortex redevelopment area failed on a roll call, falling one vote short of the eight-vote threshold required for final passage (7 ayes, 5 nays). The renewal would have allowed the redevelopment corporation to continue to exercise eminent-domain rights authorized earlier.

A motion to third-read and finally pass board bill 68, which would have renewed prior blight determinations for the Cortex redevelopment area and thereby extended redevelopment corporation powers, failed on a roll call at the Oct. 24 meeting. The tally was 7 ayes and 5 nays; eight votes were required for final passage.

Issue summary Board bill 68 would have renewed earlier city findings and redevelopment authority for the Cortex West redevelopment area, a long-running downtown development initiative. Supporters said renewing the blight determination was a routine step to allow the redevelopment corporation to continue long-term redevelopment activities. Opponents objected to the delegation of eminent-domain authority to a private redevelopment corporation and argued the city should reserve eminent-domain use for direct government purposes.

Vote and rationale The alderman from the ninth moved for final passage and asked for favorable consideration; the alderwoman from the twelfth restated an objection to giving eminent-domain authority to private entities and said she would vote no for principle. On roll call the motion failed to achieve the required eight votes.

Outcome and implications The failure to renew the blight determination means the redevelopment corporation will not have renewed statutory authority via this board bill to exercise eminent-domain rights tied to the prior determination. Sponsors may reintroduce, seek alternative amendments, or pursue other paths, but the recorded final-vote failure ended the measure at final passage in this session.