Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Property owner questions landmark status as city approves Syndicate Cycle signs in historic overlay
Summary
The Planning Commission approved a creative‑sign and landmark‑modification permit for Syndicate Cycle at 730 Montgomery Street, while the property owner said she had not been notified that the building met landmark criteria.
The Oroville Planning Commission approved a creative‑sign permit and landmark‑modification permit for Syndicate Cycle at 730 Montgomery Street, permitting a rehabilitated front sign, a pole sign and a painted wall sign in the downtown historic overlay.
Planning staff said the property’s original front sign meets two local landmark criteria — reflecting elements of the city’s history and having special aesthetic value — and recommended review under the landmark modification process to ensure proposed changes respect historic character. Staff presented photos and sign dimensions and recommended approval with conditions.
Applicant Matthew described his decades in motorcycles and said he planned to revitalize the existing front sign and install a 35‑square‑foot pole sign and a painted wall treatment. Property owner Raquel Nolan told the commission she and her husband recently bought the building and said they were surprised to learn the property met landmark criteria; Nolan asked when and how the property had been designated and requested that the city publish and notify owners of the landmark list.
Planning staff and commissioners agreed to post and update a public list of landmarks and to work on outreach and clearer notice for property owners. Staff noted that changes in the downtown historic overlay trigger landmark review and, when appropriate, a landmark‑modification permit, and that fees for landmark alteration apply when an owner seeks to change elements covered by the local criteria.
Commissioners praised the proposed sign design and the prospect of a new downtown business. After public comment and discussion, the motion to approve the signage and landmark modification carried (motion recorded as passed).
The property owner and commissioners asked staff to prepare better public information about landmark status and to post the list of designated landmarks on the city website. Staff said it would follow up with the property owner and the historic advisory commission to review process and outreach.
