Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Youth Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Policy institute urges community‑led partnerships to improve outcomes for at‑risk youth
Summary
A Kempsey Gardner Policy Institute report recommended locally led, aligned partnerships that coordinate education, social services and employer engagement to improve long‑term outcomes for at‑risk youth. The institute highlighted Promise Partnership Utah and local case studies showing improvements in graduation rates and reductions in juvenile
The Kempsey Gardner Policy Institute presented a study on community‑led service partnerships intended to improve economic mobility and school‑to‑work outcomes for at‑risk youth.
"Where kids grow up matters," said Andrea Brandley, senior education analyst at the institute, summarizing the report’s central finding and the variation in neighborhood outcomes across Utah. The study found that Utah performs well on aggregate measures of upward mobility but that outcomes vary sharply by neighborhood and county.
Brandley listed six common elements of effective partnerships drawn from national and state examples: (1) shared goals aligned to labor‑market outcomes, (2) cross‑sector governance, (3) data sharing and measurement, (4) family‑centered services, (5) localized decision‑making, and (6) sustainable funding and policy alignment. The institute cited Promise Partnership Utah and local initiatives (Promise South Salt Lake, Roy Cohn project) as Utah examples where coordination produced measurable gains in graduation and juvenile‑justice outcomes.
Why it matters: Presenters argued the state already invests heavily in education, health and social programs for youth, but those investments are often siloed. Local partnerships can align existing funding streams to create a continuum from early childhood supports through career entry, targeting areas of concentrated need.
Implementation notes: The report recommends starting with pilot projects, aligning state and local data, and exploring blended funding mechanisms to sustain partnerships. The presenters suggested the committee consider how small, targeted state investments and coordination can scale successful local models.
