Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fund Balance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Northumberland supervisors authorize Davenport to solicit financing, endorse 20% fund-balance policy
Summary
Advisors from Davenport & Company recommended the county adopt a formal fund-balance policy (20% target) and a budget-stabilization fund and to use limited long-term financing to replenish reserves. The board authorized Davenport to seek competitive bids for a financing package and agreed to consider the results during the November budget process.
Davenport & Company presented a multi-page review of Northumberland County's cash flow and reserve position and recommended a two-part approach: adopt a formal fund-balance policy setting an end-of-year target of 20% of expenditures and establish a budget-stabilization fund to cushion unanticipated costs.
"The goal here really is to do two things, get ourselves a policy in place that we could build back towards, and get ourselves out of the business of having to do these RANs into the future," Davenport senior adviser Kyle Lautz told the board. He said recent one-time expenditures and low cash at key points in the year made the county vulnerable to revenue anticipation notes (RANs).
Davenport proposed a pragmatic buildup plan: (1) adopt a 20% fund-balance policy as a long-term target; (2) create a small budget-stabilization reserve (a few percentage points of the budget) for intra-year surprises; and (3) consider limited, fixed-rate financing to reimburse recent capital outlays and to finance some planned FY26 capital so the county can rebuild cash reserves. The firm estimated roughly $5—7 million would be needed to move materially toward the target and sketched a financing structure that, if implemented as described, would raise annual debt service by about $260,000 (estimated) and be phased into budget planning in FY27.
Board members asked about alternatives such as splitting tax collections twice a year to smooth cash flow, and about the interest and rating implications. Lautz said a 20% target is consistent with peer practice and helps reduce the need for annual short-term borrowing; he noted the state local-government investment pool was yielding roughly 4.4% at the time of the briefing and used conservative borrowing-rate assumptions (planning assumption ~5% tax-exempt, ~6% taxable).
A supervisor moved and the board approved a motion to authorize Davenport & Company to solicit competitive proposals from banks and other bidders and to return to the board with results (Davenport expected to report back in November). The motion carried on an affirmative board vote.
