Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parking Ordinance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

First reading: Chippewa County considers no-parking ordinance affecting 1917 Lake Wissota frontage

Chippewa County Board of Supervisors · October 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

On first reading the board reviewed Ordinance 8-25, which would establish no-parking zones and modify parking near 90 Fifth Avenue to improve sight lines and parking for a restaurant property (1917 Lake Wissota). Property owners and a supervisor expressed support; the ordinance will return for a second reading and a vote.

The Chippewa County Board heard the first reading of Ordinance 8-25, which would amend section 58-34(a) of the county code to create new no-parking zones along a segment of roadway near 90 Fifth Avenue and to re-open about 560 feet of parking in another segment.

A representative of the property identified as "1917 Lake Wissota" (Darren Senn) spoke during public comment to thank the highway committee and Supervisor Jason Bergeron for work on the proposal; he said the owners support the changes as a proactive step to create a safer parking environment and to preserve access for customers. Another local speaker, Jason Darley, echoed that support and commended Bergeron for representing district concerns.

During the ordinance presentation staff described a map using color coding: blue areas would be designated no-parking stretches beginning at the intersection near 90 Fifth Avenue and extending specified distances; green markers would enforce standard intersection no-parking buffers (roughly 75 feet to the center line); and a red segment shown on the map would reopen about 560 feet for additional parking. Supervisor questions included whether the county could reduce the posted speed limit; staff said a DOT speed study was underway and that speed reductions require DOT approval and, in many cases, physical roadway changes.

The item was presented as a first reading; the board did not vote on the ordinance at this meeting and will consider a second reading and final action at a future meeting.