Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Residential Setback Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Gahanna planning commission approves variance for small addition at 675 Park Edge Drive

Gahanna Planning Commission · October 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved a variance allowing a 280-square-foot addition to encroach to 10 feet from the north property line at 675 Park Edge Drive, citing a narrow buildable area caused by a rear floodplain and neighbor support.

The Gahanna Planning Commission on Oct. 22 approved a variance (VDash0024-2025) permitting a 280-square-foot addition to come within 10 feet of the north property line at 675 Park Edge Drive, reducing the required 15-foot side-yard setback for R-1 large-lot residential zoning.

Planning staff told the commission the rear of the lot is constrained by a 100- and 500-year floodplain, leaving limited buildable area and explaining why the addition could not be located elsewhere on the parcel. Staff recommended approval, noting the applicant submitted four neighbor statements in support, including the contiguous property owner to the north.

Homeowner Larry Champlin, who lives at 675 Park Edge Drive, said the encroachment amounts to "just the corner, a small 16 square foot, actually, of a corner," and that the addition’s siding, roofing and windows will match the existing home. Commissioners asked about easements, paving and materials; Champlin confirmed there are no easements at the work area and no paving or driveway will be added.

Commissioners cited the constrained lot and neighbor support in backing the variance. Commissioner Mako moved to approve the application; Commissioner Siriano seconded. The roll-call vote was unanimous among commissioners present and the motion carried.

Because the property’s rear is bordered by floodplain and the house is angled on the lot, staff concluded there are minimal alternative locations for the addition and recommended approval as presented. The commission recorded no conditions beyond the standard permitting and building requirements.