Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Instructional Materials topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
HISD staff outline new state instructional‑materials review (HQIM/IMRRA) and next steps for adoption
Summary
Huntsville ISD staff briefed trustees on the state27s new IMRRA/HQIM instructional‑materials review process and how the district will evaluate high‑quality instructional materials and training supports.
HUNTSVILLE — Huntsville ISD staff briefed trustees on the state27s revised instructional‑materials review process and how the district plans to evaluate and—if appropriate—adopt high‑quality instructional materials (HQIM).
Josh Kimble, director of curriculum and instructional materials, explained the IMRRA/HQIM framework established by 2023–2025 legislative changes (including House Bill 1605 and more recent rules discussed in the special session). Kimble said the new process requires materials to align to 100% of the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills and provide implementation supports such as job‑embedded professional development. He described three funding streams: the district instructional materials and technology allotment (IMTA), a State Board of Education entitlement (about $40 per enrolled student), and a state OER entitlement (about $20 per enrolled student).
Kimble summarized district findings from campus curriculum committees: only one of the district’s 12 core instructional materials currently meets HQIM criteria; supplemental and partial‑subject purchases have produced a fragmented set of resources; and staff estimate that replacing partial purchases with approved HQIM could free local allotment dollars for coaching and implementation support. He said the district will convene its district curriculum and instructional committee on Oct. 23 and intends to deliver any HQIM recommendations at a subsequent board meeting.
Trustees asked about Bluebonnet (the state‑developed option), the role of coaching and mentor models for teachers, how adoption costs would be funded, and whether the state assessment changes under House Bill 8 increased the value of a centrally aligned curriculum. Kimble and Dr. Shepherd said entitlements could cover HQIM purchases and free up IMTA dollars for training and coaching; they stressed that successful implementation requires master schedules, PLC time, and job‑embedded coaching.
Why it matters: The shift to HQIM is intended to ensure materials fully match Texas standards and to provide implementation support for teachers. Trustees framed the change as a potential strategy to accelerate instruction for novice teachers and to improve vertical/horizontal alignment across grades.
What happens next: The district curriculum and instructional committee will meet Oct. 23 to synthesize campus feedback; the board expects a follow‑up recommendation at the next board meeting.
