Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Oct. 9 Goochland County Board actions
Summary
Key outcomes from the Oct. 9 meeting: proclamation adopted, consent agenda approved, Technology Zone deferred to Nov. 6, a small proffer amendment approved, and a 109‑acre Serenity Trail rezoning denied (3–2).
Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Goochland County Board of Supervisors recorded the following formal actions on Oct. 9. This summary lists each action, the motion, and the documented outcome.
1) Proclamation — Domestic Violence Awareness Month Motion: Chair moved to adopt the proclamation recognizing October 2025 as Domestic Violence Awareness Month (read by staff). Outcome: Adopted (voice vote: unanimous). No roll-call recorded; motion made, seconded and approved.
2) Approval of minutes Motion: Motion to approve action minutes (CIP work session and regular meeting). Outcome: Approved (voice vote: unanimous).
3) Consent agenda (items 1–4: assigned uses of general fund balance; VDOT pedestrian facilities agreements for Mosaic West Creek sections 6 & 7; others) Motion: Move to approve consent agenda items 1–4. Outcome: Approved (voice vote: unanimous).
4) Technology Zone ordinance (public hearing deferral) Motion: Move to defer the public hearing on the Technology Zone to Nov. 6, 2025 so it can be considered alongside the Technology Overlay District. Outcome: Approved by roll call (Yes: Lyle, Christie, Spoonauer, Waters, Winfrey — 5‑0).
5) Proffer amendment (RZ‑2025‑4 — Pond View Lane small subdivision; applicant: Board of Supervisors as applicant) Motion: Move to approve proffer amendment RZ‑2025‑4 as presented. Outcome: Approved (roll call recorded: unanimous approval).
6) Serenity Trail rezoning (RZ‑2025‑2: 109.22 acres to Residential Preservation) Motion: Motion to deny the rezoning application (board considered applicant request to defer but proceeded to public hearing and then action). Outcome: Motion to deny passed by roll call (Yes: Lyle, Christie, Spoonauer; No: Waters, Winfrey — denial affirmed 3‑2). County code prevents substantially similar rezoning application for 12 months after denial.
Notes: Votes recorded as roll calls where indicated in the transcript. Where the transcript recorded only voice votes, the minutes reflect unanimous approval.

