Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Policy 9140 Rescind topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee recommends rescinding broad employee policy (9140.1) after legal cross-check

Newburgh City School District Policy Committee · October 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The policy committee recommended rescinding a broadly written employee-misconduct policy (listed in the attachments as 91,40 / 91 40.1) after staff cross-checked collective bargaining agreements and state/federal protections and found overlapping grievance procedures and legal remedies.

The Newburgh City School District policy committee on Oct. 14 recommended rescinding a broadly worded employee policy (identified in committee materials as 91,40 / 9140.1) after staff and legal counsel concluded key protections are already covered by collective-bargaining agreements and state and federal law.

Staff said they cross-checked the policy against collective-bargaining grievance procedures and existing district policies that address discrimination, harassment, workplace violence, whistleblower protections and the student code of conduct. Those contractual grievance procedures, staff explained, are legally binding and in some areas supersede local policy.

Legal counsel told the committee that state and federal legal protections—including civil-service rules, human-rights protections, OSHA standards, Title VII and the federal Civil Rights Act—provide baseline employee protections. Counsel said rescinding the policy could be appropriate but cautioned that a gap could remain for managerial or confidential employees not covered by bargaining units; counsel estimated that gap might affect "a dozen or two" staff members and said the district could consider drafting a narrowly tailored replacement policy for those positions.

Committee members asked whether the important content of the policy to be removed was preserved elsewhere; staff replied that most substantive protections were found in contracts and other district policies. The committee directed staff to proceed with the rescission recommendation subject to confirming coverage for nonrepresented employees and to consider a narrowly targeted replacement if needed.

Outcome: committee consensus to advance the recommendation to rescind 9140.1 and to return with any proposed narrow replacement for nonrepresented staff.