Citizen Portal
Sign In

Planning board forwards Price Creek land‑use and rezoning applications with recommendation of denial

City of Lake City Planning & Zoning Board (joint session with Board of Adjustment and Historic Preservation Agency) · November 13, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board recommended denial of two related applications from Price Creek LLC — CPA 25‑10 (future‑land‑use amendment for more than 50 acres) and Z 25‑12 (rezoning of 10+ contiguous acres to City industrial). Both recommendations passed by split roll‑call votes (4‑1).

The Lake City Planning & Zoning Board voted to forward two related items to City Council with recommendations of denial: CPA 25‑10, a comprehensive‑plan amendment seeking a future‑land‑use change for more than 50 acres by Price Creek LLC; and PZLPA Z 25‑12, a rezoning application to change 10 or more contiguous acres from county rural residential to city industrial.

City Attorney Martin read the title of the resolutions and cited the statutory amendment procedures used in the application (references to Florida Statutes addressing comprehensive plan amendments were read into the record). After discussion was closed, Miss Johnson moved to adopt the board’s recommended denial of CPA 25‑10 and a second was recorded. Roll call produced a split vote: Miss McCollum — yes; Miss Wilson — yes; Miss Johnson — yes; Mister Carlucci — no; Mister Lydic — yes. By a 4‑1 margin, the board adopted the resolution recommending denial and will forward it to City Council.

The board then considered the companion rezoning resolution (Z 25‑12). Martin read the resolution recommending denial of the proposed rezoning from county rural residential to city industrial. Again, the board moved and seconded to adopt the denial language. Roll call mirrored the prior outcome and the board forwarded Z 25‑12 to City Council with a recommendation of denial by split vote.

The transcript records the board’s actions and the roll‑call tallies; it does not include substantive new findings in the hearing record beyond the title readings and the board’s previously stated recommendation to deny. The items will be considered next by the City Council; the dates for council consideration were not specified in the record.