Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Boundary Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fairfax board moves forward with boundary review; proposes phased opening for Western High School
Summary
Staff reported public feedback on scenario 4 of a county-wide boundary review and proposed a three-year phased opening and ramp-up for the newly purchased Western High School campus, starting with opt-in 9th and 10th grades from the western pyramids.
Fairfax County Public Schools staff updated the board on the division's comprehensive boundary review and the proposed phased opening of the new Western High School campus purchased this year.
Eric Gordon, chief facilities officer, and Superintendent Dr. Reed summarized the review process under policy 81-30 and the Boundary Review Advisory Committee (BRAC): the consultant developed three incremental scenarios that were refined into a single public scenario 4; the BRAC and public meetings generated roughly 8,300 comments via Boundary Explorer and about 2,500 meeting attendees across two rounds of neighborhood sessions.
On the Western High School campus, staff proposed a multi-year approach to integrate the site and minimize student disruption:
- Year 1 (2026-27): open to 9th and 10th grades via an opt-in for students from the five western pyramids (Chantilly, Centerville, Westfield, Oakton and South Lakes as applicable). Students who opt in from within a yet-to-be-drawn final boundary would be provided bus service once the boundary is established; students who opt in from outside that final boundary would be expected to provide their own transportation or get to an approved bus stop.
- Year 2 (2027-28): add a new 9th-grade cohort; previous 9th/10th cohorts become 10th/11th. The school could move to an opt-out model for students inside the drawn boundary while allowing limited transfers where space exists.
- Year 3 (2028-29): full 9'0 grades; the new campus would operate as a typical 9—2 comprehensive high school with a defined boundary. Staff said the phased approach allows extracurricular eligibility (subject to VHSL rules) and time to build curricular pathways.
Staff emphasized that initial bus routing for Year 1 will align with the final boundary once it is drawn; the decision to fund broader transportation phasing and exact phasing details will have budget implications and will be part of superintendent recommendations to the board. Facilities staff also presented a tentative construction/permit timeline for site work, fields, and interior modifications and said change-of-use paperwork has been submitted to the county.
Board members sought additional details about costs, siblings and transfer policy, athletic eligibility under VHSL rules, and how the phased opening would affect nearby renovation projects such as Centerville High School. Staff committed to returning more-detailed staffing, construction and transportation cost estimates as BRAC finalizes scenario 5 and the superintendent prepares recommendations to present to the board for formal action.
What to watch: the BRAC will meet again in late November and early December to finalize its input; the superintendent's recommendations targeted to the board are expected after those meetings and before the board's January decision window; transportation and phasing budget decisions are scheduled for board consideration in December-January cycle.
